diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff b/source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bd4b1466 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/a/procps/procps.nowarning.diff @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +--- ./ps/parser.c.orig 2004-08-09 17:41:10.000000000 -0700 ++++ ./ps/parser.c 2004-08-16 18:30:09.000000000 -0700 +@@ -1213,12 +1213,20 @@ + // about "ps -aux" suddenly changing behavior if a user "x" were + // added to the system. + // ++ // Yes, this is still getting patched out here. IMO, people can change ++ // old habits if and when user 'x' comes along. I still find this warning ++ // to be a POLA violation. No offense... that's the beauty of open source. ++ // You've got your ideas about this, and I have mine, and we're allowed ++ // to disagree. Nothing in the UNIX or POSIX standards requires this (annoying) ++ // warning to be displayed, and we're not changing the actual behavior ++ // of ps in any way. I know of no other 'ps' that produces this message. ++ // + // Also, a "-x" option is coming. It's already there in fact, + // for some non-default personalities. So "ps -ax" will parse + // as SysV options... and you're screwed if you've been patching + // out the friendly warning. Cut-over is likely to be in 2005. +- if(!(personality & PER_FORCE_BSD)) +- fprintf(stderr, "Warning: bad ps syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See http://procps.sf.net/faq.html\n"); ++ // if(!(personality & PER_FORCE_BSD)) ++ // fprintf(stderr, "Warning: bad ps syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See http://procps.sf.net/faq.html\n"); + // Remember: contact albert@users.sf.net or procps-feedback@lists.sf.net + // if you should feel tempted. Be damn sure you understand all + // the issues. The same goes for other stuff too, BTW. Please ask. |